«

»

Jul 01

How To Write a Negative Review

Consider this a script for a video that I want to do one day. I, however, do not have a camera, nor the appropriate software (and experience with said software) to do it the way I want at the moment.

It would start like this:

 

The music begins (I’m not sure what it would be just yet) and fade into grainy, black and white footage of the young book blogger. He/she is at the end of a really long book. The book is slammed close. The blogger has a look of disgust on his/her face.

They throw the book down, and pick up the laptop. From over his/her shoulder we can see the mean, angry, and thoughtless comments they are writing in their review of the book. Just when they go to hit “post” or “publish” (or whatever), they pause. They look pensive. Cut to shot of author reading bad review, which might look something like this this video from author Lauren DeStefano (talking about GoodReads):

 

Then there are shots of Twitter outrage from fans of the author/genre/blogger and all Hell breaks loose. People talk about it for days. Angry comments are left. Angry vlogs are recorded. Images of these outcomes dance through the blogger’s mind (and across your screen). Blogger hesitates. He/she opens a new tab on the browser and calls up my blog (it’s my video) and consults the handy little list of suggestions that I am about to share with you on how to give a bad review. The list looks something like this:

1. Say something nice.

Compliment the cover.  Praise the font choice.  Thank them for the page count – but do it nicely.  Always try to start with something good, and try to keep the snark a bit subdued.  It can be hard. I know. Believe me. (Cut to example of mean, snarky review)

2. Be fair.

Admit that you aren’t the target audience. Tell people that you are not an expert.  Let people know there are other opinions, and link to a few if you can find them. (Cut to example of a review that isn’t fair…some WSJ articles come to mind).

3.  Focus on the book.

Odds are you don’t know the author. If you do, then you probably shouldn’t be reviewing the book. Don’t make your review a book a personal attack on the person who wrote it.  The review should focus on the book and what was right/wrong about it.  Don’t let your review turn into a rant about the issues being addressed in the book. The book, the issue, and the author are all separate entities.  The book is the only thing being reviewed. (Cut to another example of what not to do. I can think of a few recent examples.)

The video would then cut back to young blogger, who has now realized that what they have written may not be what they really wanted to say.  He/she deletes the post, then starts on something new – and they start with something nice.

Fin.

I would love to hear your thoughts on how to write a negative review.  If you have another rule that should make the list, then please put it in the comments below.

Oh, and should anyone feel the need to make a video of this – for some odd reason – then please share it with me! I’d love to see it!


Permanent link to this article: http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog/2011/07/how-to-write-a-negative-review/

  • http://thenextbestbookblog.blogspot.com Lori (TNBBC)

    Too bad you were not able to make this into the video you envision.. because it would totally rock :)

    I agree that people tend to put too much emotion into negative reviews, things that are unhelpful and extremely hurtful. Construtive reviews take the things that didn't work for you, and shed some light on what would have worked better.

    Using examples from the book to illustrate what you, as the reader, would have liked to be done different, can be helpful too.

    Nice post, Cass!

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      I think you make some excellent suggestions. I hadn't even thought of the examples one, which is a shocker since I drill that into my students every single semester. A bit off my game, I guess :)

      Thanks for the compliment. Someday, I will be a (short) film producer. Until then…

  • http://www.JenandthePen.com Jen

    There have been a spate of "attack the author" reviews lately. It always comes off petty. I agree with Lori — if you have something negative to say, base it on a close read of the book.

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      That's exactly what I tell my students when we're doing an analysis. I wonder how many people don't associate a review with analysis. They're not that far off, really. Any good analysis will end up making an argument about the quality of the text. Any good review (whether positive or negative) should be able to show that you've thought about what you didn't like about it – that you analyzed the text and your reaction to it.

      I'm loving these comments. It's making me think :)

  • http://www.thepickygirl.com jenn aka the picky g

    This is why I think it's perilous to get too close to authors on Twitter, Facebook, wherever. Because then it IS personal – no matter how professional you are.

    I write negative reviews for a couple of reasons. A. I don't like every book I read, for a variety of reasons. B. People visit my blog to hear about what books I like and what I recommend. Part of that is hearing what you don't like. Otherwise, what is the spectrum? C. I write negative reviews because usually I liked a big part of the book – sometimes almost all of it – and then the author/editor allows something to change the book for me in a way that doesn't work or isn't natural to the flow of the book. I like to talk about that. D. People view book differently. I like to start discussions, and when people disagree about books (respectfully), I enjoy the conversation and learn something.

    But never do I attack the author. Honestly, very often, I don't even consider him/her. I get irritated with editing often, but again, I know it's not always the editor allowing certain things in.

    My negative reviews are honest and thoughtful, like I try to make most of my reviews. And if I flat out didn't like a whole book, I usually don't review it. Because I can't follow #1 in that instance. It's very much like grading essays.

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      I usually don't interact with an author all that much until after I've read their work. At that point, I wouldn't feel comfortable reviewing anything else, though I might respond to it. I'm a firm believer that there is a difference between a review and a response. Of course, I've talked (tweeted/emailed) with several of the authors I've reviewed or plan on reviewing in the future, but I haven't become friends with any of them. Acquaintances, I guess you might say.

      When I write my negative reviews, I very much try to write them like I would a critique to one of my students. I talk about what worked, what didn't, and what could have been done to change it. If I can make it to the end of a book, then I usually liked it enough to write something good about it. That works for the blog, but I'm not sure how I'd handle it if I were a "professional" reviewer (hmmm….). I just don't finish books that I don't like within the first 50 pages or 5 chapters.

      I don't have a problem writing a negative review. I do, however, get tired of reading negative reviews that, in the end, aren't really about the book at all. That's really my pet peeve. I think that's why this idea has been floating around in my head.

  • http://curiositykilledthebookworm.blogspot.com/ Ellie

    I learned how to critique in art college even though I don't believe my reviews are really critiques it's still useful to remember those rules, like those you've mentioned. Negatives should always be balanced with something positive. I think it's nice when bloggers link to differing reviews too, I've often seen this in the way of "I didn't like this book but these readers did".

    I've had some really great responses from authors when I've been critical of something. Being respectful is all they want.

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      That's always the key – respect. I've gotten emails/Tweets from authors who thanked for the kindness of a not exactly great review. I think that some people are truly not aware of how their words will be read. Hopefully, they outnumber the people who just want to be mean. Respect is the key.

  • http://www.readheavily.com Sean Giorgianni

    The idea of a "negative review" troubles me.

    It's helpful to remember that every attempt at artistry starts with a positive intent and, in some context, is always appropriate.

    Finding the intended context and acknowledging the attempt are the alpha and the omega of what it means to be a reader. Anything less is a cop out and not worth the energy to read – or create. So why bother?

    That being said, you can't convince me that Henry James is worth reading or that Don DeLilo has something to say.

    Just sayin'.

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      I think I get where you're coming from.

      I think that a lot of the conflict could be avoided if both sides (artists/writers and reviewers/bloggers) remembered that criticism was meant to be constructive. Everyone takes everything too personally. They forget that everyone is entitled to his/her own opinion. The artist/writers need to be validated, and the reviewer/blogger want to be given what they want. If it doesn't meet their expectations, then they get angry. That's why the conflicts arise.

      I understand that reaction. I've had it – but I don't write about it.

  • http://www.bookdout.wordpress.com Shelleyrae

    What a timely post. I just wrote a post that contains quite a lot of (what I hope is) constructive critiscm) that I felt quite strongly about it. I tried to provide balance in the review and I don't believe there is anything personal about the points I have made but I am still sensitive to the fact that the author would likely be upset by it if she actually read it. I gave examples and encouraged readers to find other reviews as well (at this point none others have been posted anywhere though it has received a handful of low ratings with no explanation) As it was an uncorrected proof I thought my feedback might actually be useful but I still had a hard time trying to decide if I should publish it or not and it took me hours to write and rewrite.

    I guess I can only hope that the publisher/author sees my intent was not personal. I'd actually appreciate your feedback on it in light of your opinion.

    You can contact me via my supplied email address

    Shelleyrae

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      I'll stop by the site and take a look. The fact that you're thinking about the review and its impact means a lot. So many others don't take the time to do that.

  • http://www.bostonbibliophile.com Marie

    I try to emphasize that while the book wasn't for me, it might work for X kind of reader- and I always try to think about the right audience for the book but when that's not me, that's not me. Having said that, I would say

    -find something nice to say

    -don't be obsequious. If you didn't like the book it's ok to say so.

    -don't attack the author personally but it's fine to say i wish the author had done X or hadn't done Y.

    -it's OK to say you disagree with the author's point of view if it's nonfiction.

    -dont' say the book was poorly written even if you think it was.

    -try not to be too sarcastic. i've done it but i try to avoid it these days.

    -if you really hated it, no one says you HAVE to review it.

    -negative reviews can be just as helpful to your readers as positive ones. if you had issues with a book your readers might WANT to know that.

    -move on as quickly as possible to something you DID enjoy.

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      I love your suggestions! You bring up some points that I just had not considered – at least not while writing this post. To keep myself from getting in trouble (cause I don't always watch myself as closely as I should), I just don't finish books that I'm sure I'll hate, and I don't review my guilt pleasure books – ones that I read because I have always read them, because I like the characters or the premise, but that are absolutely sub-par in terms of writing style. I shall not name them here ;)

  • http://lucybordbooks.wordpress.com Lucybird

    I always try to be fair with my negative review, I try to make sure it isn't all negative, and if I have seen positive reviews I mention them.

    I did once have an author contact me about a negative review. He had asked me to read it, and he knew I wasn't a big reader of the genre. I had felt a bit mean writing the review but I still put good points in, and it was how I felt about the book. I was a bit indignant when he e-mailed me about it, if he wanted me to review the book he should have been prepared for me to say what I thought, whether I liked it or not.

    • http://indiereaderhouston.com/blog Cassandra

      I don't accept a lot of books from author's who pitch me directly. For one, I've found that most of them are self-pubbed, which I can't bring myself to deal with, or I can tell from the email that I either wouldn't like the work based on the quality of the writing and/or they wouldn't be able to handle what I had to say.

      I agree – if they approach you, then they have to be prepared for an honest review. Whatever that might be.

  • http://www.ruthseeley.com Ruth Seeley

    It's even more important with a negative review to actually provide quotes that back up what you're saying. I tend to quote far more extensively when giving a negative review than a positive one, so people will be able to judge for themselves. Books aren't getting the kind of substantive editing attention they were 30, 40, 50 years ago, and painful though it must be for a writer to read a negative review, hopefully if it isn't also a mean-spirited review it can be a learning experience.

    In some ways I find it harder to review on my blog than when I was getting paid to review for an actual publication. Part of what you have to take into account when you know who your audience is: will the readership of this publication think it's worthwhile to read? As a blogger one tends not to have the same kind of demographic and socio-cultural info on one's readership as publications are able to gather from their subscribers. Which makes blog reviewing simultaneously easier and more difficult.

    I don't really think talking about the page count, cover design or font has any real legitimacy in a book review. And I don't think one's obliged to try to find something good about a book you hate. It's not like going shopping with your BFF where you have to temper 'not your style' with 'that colour is lovely on you.'

  • http://www.noseinabook.co.uk Nose in a book

    Agreed. I believe in being honest, which means that most of my reviews contain at least something negative, but I always try to include good as well. Definitely agree that you should talk about the book, not the author, which is why I disagree with one of your other commenters above who says you can’t take the book design into account. Sure you can, that’s part of the package. The author may not be comforted to know that you liked the font choice but they’re kidding themselves if they think the text doesn’t show the stamp of the publisher as well. Everything from the level of copy editing and fact checking through to the paper quality and marketing campaign are part and parcel of that book. And all those things can affect your enjoyment when reading it.

Content Protected Using Blog Protector By: PcDrome.